| UNC / Philosophy / Parr Center / Ethics Q & A | About the Parr Center | How Can I Get Involved | center News & Events | Ethical issues in the news |
![]() |
||||
ETHICS Q & ARecently Posted Question: What is the relationship between Ethics and Values? Response: The question invites making the sorts of distinctions characteristic
of academic philosophy, but it is important not to lose sight of more
widely held understandings of the notions of “ethics” and
“values.” A short answer about the relationship between ethics
and values is relatively straightforward: one’s ethics is the systematization
and application of one’s values. “Ethics” is also a
term for an academic discipline that studies what to value, how to systematize
our values, and how to apply them. In contemporary political debate, we often hear references to issues
that bear on one’s values. Abortion is an obvious case of an issue
that divides us according to our values. Values (respect, honesty, happiness,
truth, etc.) are taken to be our fundamental commitments. Often, our values
are backed up by certain conceptions of ourselves – as, say, creations
of God or as rational beings. Insofar as one’s values are connected
to each other in a coherent way, they are parts of one’s ethics. It is hardly surprising that when people’s values differ, so do
their ethics. But people with similar values on one level may order or
structure them differently and, therefore, end up with different ethics,
as well. For instance, two people may each value respect and honesty,
but while one may see their significance as deriving ultimately from God’s
will, the other may see their value in their contribution to general welfare.
Our agreement on certain values – even when we disagree over the
source of their value – often allows for political agreement despite
different basic worldviews. It might also be useful to distinguish between a value and something’s
having value. It is at least conceivable that someone might have a value—i.e.,
value something--without the object of their value actually having value.
I might value my stamp collection very much, but that doesn’t obviously
mean that it has value. On the other hand, some claim that value can in
fact be conferred on things by certain sorts of creatures – like
God, or human beings – that have a power to imbue things with significance
through the means of valuing. Insofar as I desire or care about something,
it may seem to take on value. Additionally, one might think that some
things have value regardless of whether anyone values them (would a beautiful
vista lack value if humans were not on Earth to appreciate it?). What makes something valuable, i.e. something really of value? It looks
like not everything people value is valuable. It is important, then, to
keep the idea of something valued distinct from the idea of something
valuable. The question of what is really valuable gets to the heart of
ethics, and moves us beyond the confines of your question. But new insights
into what is valuable may profoundly affect one’s ethics –
simply consider how the modern decline in religious-based ethics has been
accompanied by a search for non-divine sources of value. We might then
conclude that one’s values are one’s beliefs about what is
valuable and about what the source of that value is. For further reading of an introductory nature, you might consider either Simon Blackburn’s Being Good, or James Rachels’ The Elements of Moral Philosophy. These essays are intended to foster debate and discussion on the issue addressed. This essay does not necessarily reflect the views of the Parr Center for Ethics or any of its fellows. We invite you to join the discussion. Please visit our blog at:
|
CHECK AGAIN SOON FOR RESPONSES TO YOUR ETHICS QUESTIONS. PLEASE EMAIL YOUR QUESTIONS TO US AND WRITE "ETHICS Q & A" IN THE TITLE.
> HOME |
|||
| Mission / History / Staff / Advisory Board / Board of Visitors / Fellows / Becoming a Fellow / Join the Mailing List / Make a Donation / Center News | ||||
| |
|
|
|
|